Suppose a test particle undergoes circular motion in Schwarzschild spacetime, and not necessarily at the freefall rate. We assume its worldline is “centred on
” so to speak, or to be technical we could speak of the integral of a Killing vector field which is timelike at the given location: this also includes the case of no rotation at all but that’s fine. For simplicity, orient Schwarzschild-Droste coordinates so the motion coincides with the “equator”
, and also with increasing
-coordinate. Note the
-coordinate is constant. Define the angular velocity as the coordinate ratio
![]()
assumed to be constant. We can solve for the 4-velocity of the particle:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[u^\mu = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2M/r-r^2\Omega^2}}\big(1, 0, 0, \Omega\big)\]](http://cmaclaurin.com/cosmos/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-bc0d81f26937737baf28bdce20738740_l3.png)
which by definition is also the “time” vector
of the particle’s orthonormal frame. We must have
![]()
for the motion to remain timelike. Note that while freefall circular motion requires
to be outside the photon sphere, for accelerated circular motion any
is permissible.
Now for the “space” vectors, it is natural, given our orientation of coordinates, to define two of them as simply normalised coordinate vectors:
![]()
![]()
This fixes the final vector
in the tetrad up to orientation (overall
factor), so we choose the orientation with positive
-component:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2M/r-r^2\Omega^2}} \big(r\Omega/\sqrt{1-2M/r},0,0,\sqrt{1-2M/r}/r\big)\]](http://cmaclaurin.com/cosmos/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-c08e37d06c25635c19d1b040857385b6_l3.png)
Then
as required, where
is the Kronecker delta function. The particle’s 4-acceleration is given by the covariant derivative
. I omit the result, but only the
-component is nonzero, which is not unexpected. The length of the 4-acceleration vector is the magnitude of proper acceleration:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[\frac{\lvert M-r^3\Omega^2\rvert \sqrt{1-2M/r}}{r^2(1-2M/r-r^2\Omega^2)}\]](http://cmaclaurin.com/cosmos/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-8b0cbd550a3820007fd842efc174ad5a_l3.png)
For the special case of geodesic motion the acceleration must vanish, so
, and the factor
reduces to
. See Hartle (
§9.3) for a very different derivation of this. For
the expression reduces to the familiar acceleration of a static observer.